The Only Opinion That Matters (Part 2)
The Top 28 List

by Jesse N. Willey

Welcome to the second edition of "The Only Opinion that Matters." The first of which also appeared in this very issue. What is the only opinion that matters? Mine, of course. Obviously so, if anyone else's opinion was worth its weight in crap they'd call their column "The Only Opinion That Matters." They don't, Q.E.D., they don't matter.

This month I'd like to give my thoughts on some things said by my colleagues in this fine magazine. They were written by very intelligent gentlemen who just suffer from the problem that they are utterly and completely wrong. There is nothing worse that someone who is intelligent, well intentioned in their opinion but also hopelessly misinformed.

Two issues ago, one of these men said that the Crisis on Infinite Earths caused more problems than it solved and that the Post Crisis DC universe wasn't "as enjoyable" as the Silver Age. You mean back when they were a handful of artists who could draw and the dialogue was bland, indistinct and about as riveting as an episode of Antiques Roadshow? When the writers were basically monkeys throwing their dung at the wall and seeing what would stick? That might explain DC's obsession with gorilla covers.

I would argue that Crisis didn't do as much as it should have. The best thing to come out of Crisis were the revitalized Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman. Their continuity changes caused problems for lots of other titles. Some of these books like The New Titans managed to remain vital in spite of this. Others tried to hold onto the fading embers of the Silver Age. (Pocket Universe, anyone?) Sometimes I wonder what DC could have accomplished if they had stuck with the original plan and rebuilt everything from the ground up.

If you think about it, the Golden and Silver Age of comics is a double edged sword. The really old stories bring long time fans back for years and years. The problem is that over 70 years the medium of the super hero comic has matured. While not impossible, it just gets harder and harder to accept a world where you have Alan Moore's brooding, existential Swamp Thing running around and interacting with a Superman who spends his Sunday afternoons scouring outer space looking for his lost dog. While that sort of patchwork universe is the fuel of many a great Ambush Bug story, it isn't really helpful if you're trying to do a serious dramatic story.

Don't get me wrong; there were some good stories in the Silver Age. The problem is they were few and far between. For every Neal Adams Deadman, there were five or six dozen series like "Prez" or those god awful Wonder Tot stories. DC was just beginning to explore more mature themes that came out of the creative boom of circumventing newsstands (along with The Comics Code) and favoring comic shops. I could put up with a DC Universe where even one of the best Pre-Crisis stories like "The Judas Contract" didn't happen as long as it took DC Comics Presents #47 along with it. I'm sorry- I can't take Superman seriously if I have to think about him working with The Masters of the Universe.

I guess what I'm saying is about 90% of the truly great DC Universe stories ranging from Giffen's and Dematteis' Justice League, Peter David's Supergirl, Ennis and McCrea's Hitman, Dan Raspler's Young Heroes in Love, Gaiman's Sandman and dozens more all came out after Crisis. They were all a million times better than anything produced prior to Crisis. Even my much beloved Superboy (vol. 1) #206. See, I do like some Silver Age stuff, so there. Of course, that one is only a favorite because Carey Bates managed to sneak a marriage between Brainiac Five and a blow up doll past The Comics Code. The problem wasn't trying to build their new continuity. It was trying to tell good stories while holding on to as much the remaining garbage continuity as they possibly could. Do we really need a story when Barry Allen's head could fly in the Macy's Parade as part of modern continuity?

Secondly, I'd like to address Jason Bourgeois' Grey Matters column entitled "No Avengers". I share much of his opinion of Brian Michael Bendis. The guy is really hit or miss. Bendis can be a very capable writer. One need look no further than Alias or The Pulse to see it. He can be down right awful sometimes as well. I tried enjoying the few Daredevils of his I found in a fifty cent box, but I couldn't.

I think that save for one glitch in the system the good or awful rating on Avengers (at least as far as I've read) goes in a generally pulsing pattern. Breakout was good. The story about the Ninjas was bad. The first Spider-Woman story was good. The Sentry story was an atrocity. I'm glad I didn't have to pay money for it. The House of M cleanup was okay. Unlike Jason, I liked "The Collective". Alpha Flight has been a running joke at Marvel since at least James Hundall's run and it was fun seeing them go squish. I say Alpha Flight should become the Kenny McCormick of the Marvel Universe. Bring them back and kill them at least one per month. My feelings on the Civil War stories are mixed. I feel that as long as the character doesn't have a home book of their own, then a solo story in the book of the team they belong to is appropriate. I was fine with the Spider-Woman story and even the somewhat off putting Sentry story in the Civil War trade. Giving an issue over to Iron Man and Captain America, on the other hand, was annoying. If I wanted to read about Iron Man and Captain America, I'd read Iron Man and Captain America. (I did read them but only because I couldn't find anything good and cheap during the "buy three get one free" sales at Borders and I had earned freebies.)

I also disagree about Spider-Man not belonging on The Avengers. As much as I have mixed feelings about some Silver Age stories and I think Marvel's were generally better than DC's, it isn't like The Avengers haven't asked him to join more than half a dozen times. He was a member before, very briefly-- and was still a reservist, though all the writers have forgotten this. He knows everybody in the Marvel Universe and is practically one of Marvel's corporate logos. The Avengers have always tried, but not often succeeded, in being is the keystone book of the Marvel Universe. The X-Men usurped them, somewhat deservedly, during the Claremont/Cockrum era. Bendis has done the job of returning them to this status. I think The Avengers are now more key to understanding the Marvel Universe as they have been since any writer since Roy Thomas. I do, however, agree that in spite Wolverine's status as a corporate logo, Logan doesn't belong on The Avengers. Why? Spidey had three mainline books a month going into Avengers. That is more than most characters, but is not horrible. Certainly not as bad as Batman and Superman over at DC and they still manage to be in the Justice League. Going into Avengers, Logan had at least a supporting role in X-Men, Uncanny X-Men, Astonishing X-Men, New X-Men, at least one mini series going at any given time on top of both a Wolverine title and the now defunct Marvel Knights Wolverine. Six series, not counting New Avengers. Who does he think he is? Ryan Seacrest?

Anyway-- I think the Editor in Chief is getting ready to fire me. Hopefully, I'll be back next month with more inflammatory but undeniably true things to say. Remember, there are other opinions out there but ignore them. They don't matter. Good night everyone.


[Back to Collector Times]
[Prev.] [Return to Opinion] [Disclaimer] [Next]


Text Copyright © 2008 Jesse Willey