Gregory Benford is an exceptional writer. Dr. Asimov's
"Foundation Trilogy" an especially popular set of books. This
combination looks like a book publisher's formula for "can't miss"
profits. If not for the prominent announcement on the cover that
this publication was "Authorized by the Estate of Isaac Asimov,"
I probably would have avoided it entirely!
I was prepared to dislike this book. Much as I respect Mr. Benford's
expertise as a writer, I could not imagine him writing an Asimov tale
which would be true to the original. I wound up liking these stories
anyway, simply because they are good stories.
There are many differences between the original Foundation stories,
and these new stories. The biggest disparity seems to be in their scope.
The panorama of empire disolution and empire building provided a common
background and many common elements. Each of the stories had a different
cast of characters (although some characters from older tales provided
background for newer ones). The stories in Foundation's Fear all
occur within the same time period and have essentially the same cast of
characters. There is too, the intrusion of Isaac's robots lurking in
the background. Somewhat illogically, this almost-sinister presence is
part of what provides the "glue" which makes these stories seem more real.
R. Daneel Olivaw makes his appearance before the stories actually begin.
His secret agenda is to insure the invention of Hari Seldon's theory of
Psychohistory. There is an allusion to a new Zeroth law of Robotics ( later
explicitly cited ) which makes humanity's well-being a robot's ultimate
responsibility. Those familiar with Dr. Asimov's robot stories know that
Olivaw cannot be motivated by such a law - he was build before it existed.
So, what is his real motivation? How stable is he? I recall the
story "Liar," wherein Dr. Susan Anthony drove a positronic robot mad by
providing it with an insoluble dilemma, and demanding an immediate answer.
What makes this seem so sinister to me is the idea of protecting humanity from
itself. When the Foundation of the original stories tries to protect humanity,
it is essentially acting in self-defense, i.e., humanity is defending itself.
But, R. Daneel Olivaw is not human, so the original logic does not apply. Olivaw
is acting as an outside agency to change the course of humanity for ( possibly )
non-human reasons. Consider humanity without risk. It would be like Voltaire
without his run-ins with authority, or Joan of Arc without her fiery death.
Would the result be truly human?
Despite all of the fore-going, I really do like these stories. Mr. Benford
is an excellent writer, and has produced a work which is thoroughly readable,
is internally logical, and shares a common background with the original
Foundation stories. His attention to detail and his character development rise
above any flaws in the plot (if flaws, they are.) I whole-heartedly recommend
this book.
|