Coville's Clubhouse by Jamie Coville

An Interview With Max Allen Collins

Max Allen Collins is probably the best writer you never heard of. His works stretch from comics to novels to screenplays. He has won a number of awards for his work outside of comics, but inside the industry he's largely ignored. Among his better remembered works is Ms. Tree done through Eclipse and DC. He recently wrote a graphic novel called Road to Perdition that is extremely good and is going to be coming out in early 2001 as a movie. The movie will star Tom Hanks and be directed by American Beauty's Sam Mendes and is expected to be a major hit at the box office. In this interview we ask about Road to Perdition, Ms. Tree and numerous other topics regarding his future.

Coville:

    How long did it take you to research and write Road to Perdition?
Collins:
    The research and writing was spread out over at least a four year period; this was because of the time it took the artist, Richard Piers Rayner, to turn out his precise, detailed artwork (often working from research materials I sent to him) (he's in England).

Coville:

    How much of Road to Perdition is true? Which parts did you have to fill in with your own assumptions?
Collins:
    It's mostly fiction. John and Connor Looney are real, and much of the material involving them has some basis in reality, including the Gabel shooting and Connor's eventual death...and several lieutenants who felt betrayed by Looney. So the setting and historical underpinnings are fairly real -- though Looney's reign was more in the teens and '20s -- but the story of Michael O'Sullivan and his son is my invention.

Coville:

    Did you at all contact Michael O'Sullivan while researching his father?
Collins:
    He did not exist; I created him.

Coville:

    Road to Perdition has a number of nifty lines like "God made Irishmen pale, but not as pale as those priests who came out after papa had unburdened his soul to them." Where you thinking about a possible movie adaptation when writing?
Collins:
    Thanks -- a sort of quiet poetry emerged from the narrator's distance from the story. As for thinking about the movies, no more than usual -- but comics, as a visual medium, has ties to film. As Will Eisner has aptly pointed out, however, there are many differences between them.

Coville:

    What is the current status of Road to Perdition? Does it have a publisher?
Collins:
    ROAD TO PERDITION will be reprinted by DC in time for the movie's release. The movie will probably have a limited late '01 release to qualify for Oscars, then a wide one early in '02.

Coville:

    Did DC give you a reason when they didn't resign the rights to the book back when they had the chance?
Collins:
    They still have reprint rights. It's just the other rights -- movie, sequels, prequels, etc. -- that I own. (Actually, Richard and I own the movie rights to ROAD.)

Coville:

    What was your reaction when you learned that Sam Mendes and Tom Hanks wanted to do Road to Perdition as a movie?
Collins:
    I said I would believe it when I saw it. Having been on the set, and met and talked to both Mendes and Hanks, I believe it now! And I'm thrilled.

Coville:

    Were you at all involved in the making of the film?
Collins:
    Not really. Visited the set, spoke frequently to Producer Dean Zanuck, and have written a novelization. The script is good -- very faithful, though it compresses the material and it's somewhat less action-driven.

Coville:

    Does the success of the film concern you at all?
Collins:
    I don't quite know how to answer that. The bigger it is, the better my future -- so, sure, it concerns me! If you mean, artistically, I am convinced this will be a quality picture.

Coville:

    Do you lie awake at nights thinking about the possibilities of your future if the movie is a smash hit?
Collins:
    Sleep?

Coville:

    You've said in other interviews that you consider Road to Perdition your comic writing swan song. Has that changed?
Collins:
    Possibly. DC has spoken to me about doing a major BATMAN project. I have been working solely on novels and screenplays, however; the moribund status of the industry -- and my own disconnection from it, for several years -- hasn't sent me scurrying to comics publishers...or, frankly, vice versa. I thought I would get some calls from comics editors/publishers, after ROAD got this major movie deal...what could be bigger? The only editor who has called is Andy Helfer, who edited ROAD, God bless him.

Coville:

    There has been a lot of talk lately about how the comic industry should move towards Graphic Novels and movie deals, although not exactly hand in hand. Road to Perdition is a success in both areas but it doesn't get the praise it should within the comic industry. Does that disappoint you?
Collins:
    That was largely why I walked away from comics. ROAD got almost no reviews, and did not receive an Eisner nomination. If I could do my best work, and get no notice whatsoever...well, it was a bitter pill. Many people followed the lead that Terry Beatty and I took with MS. TREE, and we've had zero recognition while lesser, trendier crap gets raves. My attitude was, "Screw them." To some degree, frankly, it still is.

Coville:

    Do you think Road to Perdition would have gotten more reviews/praise/nominations if DC promoted it better? I tend to wonder if the lack of response is directly related to the lack of marketing on DC's part.
Collins:
    DC did some limited promotion, but ROAD was the last of the Paradox Press slate of crime novels, and the others had not done well. So we were lucky to be published at all, and DC can't be faulted much. Where they can be faulted is that some key high people at DC did not recognize the quality of the work; if they had, they would not only have promoted it, but would have matched the DreamWorks offer for movie rights (which they could have done).

    What is truly annoying to me is how DC has ignored Richard and myself, and our work, when this is arguably the biggest comics movie ever...because they are apparently embarrassed to have let ROAD "get away." If they promoted us, and bragged about a DC project being this big Hollywood deal, the people at Warner above them would ask embarrassing questions...like, why isn't this a Warner Bros. movie?

Coville:

    Do you think DC would have promoted it more if they had owned the work, lock, stock, and barrel like they do Batman?
Collins:
    Undoubtedly. But I don't think they knew what they had -- at least one of the top people simply didn't "get" it. (Let me say that Paul Levitz has been great to me and did in fact publish the book when others in his position might not have.)

Coville:

    WhatÂ’s the current situation with the rights to Ms. Tree. I know for a while it was published through DC. Do they still own the character?
Collins:
    Terry Beatty and I own MS. TREE, and we would love to do something with her, after a several year lay-off (preferably a graphic novel). A TV option is about to run out. We'll see.

Coville:

    Any chance of putting out a TPB collecting your Ms. Tree work?
Collins:
    Possible. We're available if anybody's interested. But I'm not sure where the negatives are. The early stuff we don't have, and DC controls the rest. I would love to see the DC stuff gathered, as I feel it's our best work.

Coville:

    You work in a lot of different storytelling arenas, mainly prose novels, but also in film making and music. What can you do in comics that can't be done in other forms of storytelling?
Collins:
    That would require a book-length response that neither of us has time for. I would say, however, that one aspect is the manner in which comics fall between film and prose: film is an exterior medium -- shows us the story from the outside -- and prose is an interior medium -- tells us the story from inside. Comics is the only form that can gracefully give us both the interior and exterior of a story (ROAD is a case in point). Words and music, in other words...or rather, music and words. As Eisner has pointed out, the manner in which images can be frozen, in effect...the emphasis and rhythm that is possible, a manipulation of image that is quite beyond film...makes comics a storytelling medium without peer. Unfortunately, for cultural reasons, Americans will never understand that.

    We just lost Johnny Craig. Did any newspaper in America cover that?

Coville:

    You're best known for writing in the Crime genre, both novels and comics. Do you have any desire to work in other genres?
Collins:
    I have always been attracted to suspense and crime -- because of the inherent conflict. (All good stories have a conflict at their heart.) Most genres have these elements -- I wrote the novelizations of WATERWORLD, a science-fiction story, and MAVERICK, a western, without even thinking much about the fact that they weren't "mysteries." I've written quite a bit of horror, for instance, because those same elements are there to attract me: suspense, conflict, crime. There are more mainstream subjects that interest me, too, but I would guess whatever tale I tell, suspenseful conflict...some kind of tension, fear, crime element...is going to be in there.

Coville:

    Jim Steranko recently called right now the "Kervorkian Age of Comics" saying there is too much violence in comics, linking them to the recent terrorist attacks in NYC. He went as far as to call an upcoming comic called PRO a "Terrorist Comic." As a writer who writes scenes of violence, what is your response to this?
Collins:
    Well, it's obviously hyperbole, and Steranko is if anything the master of the grand gesture. My view is a little different. What I don't like about comics and much of popular culture in recent years is a sort of phony darkness -- a juvenile, arch darkness. "Darkness" isn't tattoos and piercings and discordant music -- "darkness" is flying a fucking plane into a building...that's true darkness, and it's not terribly entertaining. I feel my work -- ANGEL IN BLACK, the latest Heller for example -- is more legitimately dark, or anyway noir, than most of this stuff. James Ellroy is the best example, of course...it's so childishly dark; everybody's a dog-raping child molester or something. Laughable.

    What's going to be interesting is seeing where popular culture goes. Hollywood is re-releasing fluff like LEGALLY BLONDE and shelving the new Arnold-kicks-terrorist-butt movie...but maybe Americans would like to see Arnold kick some terrorist butt. About now a Mike Hammer novel with a great over-the-top revenge ending might feel pretty good. But I'm relieved to be a historical novelist at the moment -- the 20th Century seems like a much safer canvas right now.

Coville:

    What are you working on now?
Collins:
    I just finished the novelization of ROAD, but I'm having trouble with DreamWorks because the licensing person feels I've put in too much material not in the script. The fact that I created this story and these characters does not seem to sway this person. So that's a small nightmare I'm wrestling with.

    And I'm working on THE LUSITANIA MURDERS, another of my "disaster" novels. Then I do the movie tie-in for THE SCORPION KING. Before the end of the year you'll see two other recent works: WINDTALKERS, a John Woo novelization, and the first CSI novel, DOUBLE DEALER.


[more Clubhouse interviews] [Back to Collector Times]
[Prev.] [Return to Comics] [Disclaimer] [Next]


Copyright © 2001 Jamie Coville

About this Author