Yes, I too will join the clamoring debate in the
streets about which is better; Spider-man or Star Wars:
Attack of the Clones. Both were well done and
visually stunning movies. However, I must say after
having seen both films at least twice, I must say I
believe Star Wars is the better film. Spider-man was
cool the first time through, but it didnt stand up to
multiple viewings. I was relatively bored and nowhere
near fully engrossed in the story or the characters on
the screen. Star Wars just keeps getting more and
more endearing the more I see it. To me that makes
Star Wars a better movie.
Spider-Man
7 out of 10 on the Spiff-O-Meter
Spiderman is visually very cool, and the screen is
electrified every single time Willem Dafoe comes on as
Norman Osborn aka Green Goblin. Gobie is by far the
absolute best thing about this movie. Dafoe does an
outstanding job with his role. Tobey Maguire does a
great job playing a relatively endearing Peter Parker.
Kirsten Dunst does a decent job playing Mary Jane's
cleavage. Yes I said MJs cleavage not MJ. Though
honestly I dont think that it was her fault that she
was written so poorly.
Having never read any Spidey books, I really had no
preconceived notions going into this film. Overall, it
was a very well done movie. It lacked the fun and
camp value that I enjoy seeing in comicbook movies.
No, I didnt like either Schumacher Batman movies.
All the high romance junk got on my nerves and made me
want to go in search of a tourniquet so that I could
shoot myself with an insulin shot to counteract the
saccharine dialogue on the screen.
Additionally, if Peter, after years of being totally in
love with Mary Jane, can honestly turn her down when
she throws herself at him, he obviously doesnt have a
healthy sex drive. Im sorry guys, if a red-headed
Kirsten Dunst threw herself at you would you tell her
you just wanted to be friends? Give me a break!
Star Wars: Episode 2 Attack of the Clones
10 on the Spiff-O-Meter
I must say I had my apprehensions about Hayden
Christensen. My preconceptions were that he looked a
little bit too girlie-man ala Leo DiCrapio to be
Anakin Skywalker. I was afraid that Lucas had lost
his mind and decided to cast him because the thirteen
year old girls would adore him. My fears were not
abated in the first scene that Christensen appears in.
Hes wooden, awkward, and sounds like someone is
forcing him to speak through clenched teeth. Luckily
for us and the film, his acting drastically improves
after that. He very convincingly plays a rather
lecherous Anakin Skywalker, and delivers with chilling
conviction a speech about how he killed the people who
were responsible for his mothers death. Natalie
Portmans acting is pretty awful anytime she opens her
mouth. However, she looks drop dead gorgeous, and can
look very deadly with a blaster.
I wouldnt want to travel anywhere with Amidala, though.
I swear that woman changes clothes waaaaaaaaaaaaaay
too often.
"Is that the new engine for the ship?"
"No, its the Senators wardrobe."
You may ask why I adore this movie so much, if all Ive
said so far is pretty negative. Because the
supporting cast is absolutely unbelievable. When you
go to see the movie, close your eyes, and listen while
Ewan McGregor is talking, youll swear that he was Sir
Alec Guinness. All I have to say about the Jedi
Council is that Mace Windu and Yoda so unbelievably
kick butt.
It has it all non-saccharine romance, great music,
beautiful new worlds, a great mystery story, and high
adventure.
But most of all, it did something Star Wars has never
made me do before: it made me cry. No Episode Two
didnt make me cry; however, it does make me actually
care about Anakin Skywalker. I recently rewatched
Movies 4 thru 6, and Darth Vaders dying speech at
then end of Return of the Jedi made me sob
uncontrollably. I get teary eyed just thinking about
it.
This movie truly does start on the path to the dark
days that are going to come, and it makes me look
forward to the day in 2005 when I can sit in a theater
and watch the story complete itself.
|